Muskegon, Michigan, appears to be a little island in a sea of blue. There is also the Muskegon Museum of Art, which sits on the riverside. It’s a medium-sized organization that was established in 1912 and has a collection of about 5,000 works of art.
Kirk Hallman, the museum’s director, avoids using grandiose language when discussing the museum’s goals. MMA, on the other hand, is in the midst of some major changes. A large contribution from Elaine Melotti Schmidt and Steven Alan Bennett, collectors located in San Antonio, will make it one of the country’s few permanent museum display spaces exclusively for female-identifying artists.
Gifts totaling $12 million comprise 150 artworks from 115 artists plus a cash portion of $1.5 million for the construction of an entirely new museum wing dedicated to the work of female artists.
Elaine de Kooning paintings, as well as Artemisia Gentileschi and Mary Cassett, are included in the collection of works that have been given to the museum. The Gentileschi, for example, will be on display year-round, as will other works from the collection, according to Hallman. Additionally, the gallery will hold unique exhibitions by female artists of all disciplines.
The gift comes at a time when the museum is undergoing a 26,000-square-foot expansion project, more than doubling its current size. In early 2024, the project is projected to be completed.
It appears that the awareness of females in the realm of art is increasing. This year’s Venice Biennale has made the initial feature of the majority of female artists, and there has been a wave of corrective retrospectives for both current and deceased women artists. In some cases, these are encouraging new research, identifying institutional knowledge gaps, and in others, boosting confidence in the commercial market possibilities.
Despite this, the art industry as a whole and museums in particular have a long way to go in achieving gender parity and equality. Since Linda Nochlin’s groundbreaking piece “Why Have There Been No Great Women Artists?” was published in ARTnews in 1971, art historian Maura Reilley has documented how little progress has been made in the museum representation of female artists over the decades.
Studies conducted in the last few years have yielded relatively modest results. In the archives of 18 major American museums, 87% of the artists were men.
Bennett and Schmidt claimed that this was the motivation behind their collection. Their collection of “figurative realism” artworks began in 2009. The masterpieces in their collection show that the couple’s concept of the genre is flexible, as some fragments, such as the de Kooning, simply suggest the female form.
Bennett Prize, an open-call, jury-judged competition for female painters of any age or skill level who are working in relative obscurity and whose artwork has auctioned for $25,000 or more but are not qualified, was launched by the Bennett Prize collectors in 2018. The victor gets $50,000 to put on a solo show, making it the greatest sum of money given to female artists in the history of the competition.
To begin, the winning show is presented at the MMA before being toured across the country. However, the museum is left to rely only on the integrity of its archive after each special display concludes and the people disperse.
It wasn’t until the initial covid-19 spike in 2020 that Bennett and Schmidt began to seriously consider giving any of their collection.
‘Morality was on my mind,'” Schmidt recalled afterwards. It became clear to us that the works needed a permanent home as we got older.”
Collectors are concerned about securing the collection they’ve worked so hard to build, according to Bennett.” Museums don’t aim to collect the idea of a single collector; they want to gather specific works. A lot of the modern works we had acquired addressed the gaps in Muskegon’s female artists when we began chatting with the city.
There were no “fussy” directors at the MMA and the Bennett Prize had been well-cared-for by the organization, according to Schmidt’s description of the MMA’s board of trustees.
Whales Adopt Other Whales, Even Between Species
Do animals adopt young of other species? It’s been known to happen among canines as well as raptors. However, for the first time, marine scientists have now confirmed whales are willing to adopt the young of different whale species as well.
As it turns out, an orphaned humpback whale has found a new parental figure with a southern right whale, completely mixing two different breeds of whale. Granted, both are large sea mammals, both breathe air and generally consume the same food groups, and they are technically both whales. But in the animal world, the differences are as distinct as a horse to a cow or a dog to a black bear. However, there the pair were, swimming together and clearly bonded right off the coast of an Esperance beach. From the researcher’s perspective, the answer is clear; the adult southern whale has adopted the young and clearly smaller humpback whale.
Interestingly, the difference was caught immediately. Instead, it was Jess Wohling going over her work on a recent photography shoot who figured out what she was looking at was two different whales acting like mother and pup. At first, Wohling thought there was a camera glitch or a bad light exposure. However, as she studied the digital images from her camera, it became very clear, two different whales were swimming next to each other in tandem or like a parent and child whale pod. With the detail captured by the camera, Wohling compared the aspects of her image to whale images on the Internet, and she confirmed her hunch.
At that point, Wohling transmitted the digital image files to a whale researcher she knew, Katy Fannei. Looking at the images, Fannei not only confirmed Wohling’s assumption, she was also shocked by the documented behavior and pretty much floored. The news hit the digital wire immediately as Fannei started sharing the news with everyone she knew in her professional circle. Everyone who got the communication and images, including researchers with far more experience than Fannei were also shocked by the apparent adoption behavior.
While it is quite possible for southern right whales to come into contact with humpback whales, they almost never converge with each other for any extended period of time. A lot of new hypotheses started getting thrown around. Was the southern right whale a female in mothering mode? Maybe it lost its own pup and the timing of finding a stray humpback child was a coincidence, or maybe some sort of protection in company perspective was going on. Most agreed on the idea of adoption taking place. Again, this wasn’t unheard of in other species. Recently, an eagle pair adopted a falcon fledgling in Canada and have been raising it along with their eaglets.
The key behavior pattern arguing for adoption involves the close positioning of the humpback pup to the adult southern right whale in the water. It literally looks like a mother and child whale behavior. The major filter now is determining whether the pair are already tracked somewhere in the known southern right whale database the researchers use. If not, then the discovery will represent a unique and new biological finding.
America’s Single Remaining Hyena Born in Captivity Born in Mid-October 2022
Most people think of hyenas as scavengers and vicious animals that dying creatures have to fend off in the African Serengeti. The last thing the majority of people take into account is what a baby hyena pup might look like. However, as it turns out, folks in Hattiesburg are going to get a front row seat. Their local zoo is now the proud owner of a new pup.
Per the Hattiesburg American, the zoo’s local hyenas, spotted variety, gave birth to a new cub. There was only one born, but the parents, Pili and Niru, are doting on it. The cub arrived in mid-October, and probably broke history by doing so, now being the single living hyena born in U.S. captivity. All others have passed and those that are in zoos originally came from the wild.
In typical situations in the wild, a birth would include anywhere from a pair to four cubs at a time. That said, more than half die before they even have a chance in the wild. Worse, the mortality rate for the mothers is extremely high, with surviving females being the great majority that produce most of the cubs. In short, the first cub has the highest possibility of being fatal for the mother hyena.
Kristin Moore, representing the Hattiesburg Zoo, described the cub weighing in at 3.2 pounds the day after it was born. By a week later, it had gained an additional pound and some in weight, a positive sign. However, the zoo staff are extremely cautious and not jumping the gun. The mother is isolated with the cub to protect it, and the father has only had general exposure to the baby hyena in case he decides to attack it. Fortunately, Niru was very calm about the matter, not showing any signs of aggression but safely separated from the cub by a mesh.
To give the mother hyena, Pili, and the cub time to relax and stay healthy, their den and exposure for now is closed off from zoo guests as a public exhibit. Once the pup has gained enough size and strength, the conditions will change accordingly. The Zoo, through social media and the new PR wire, requests that Hattiesburg patrons be patient until mother and cub have clearly passed the danger stage in the newborn’s growth. Once acclimated and established, the cub and mother will then be weaned back to regular public display in the months ahead.
Promoting Women Scientists on Wikipedia
If someone said they were going to write a website post on every woman scientist and put it on the Internet, some folks might raise an eyebrow, wondering why and if the person was being a bit of a freak. However, Jessica Wade didn’t bother to make a big deal out of what she was doing. Instead, she just started writing and posting, using Wikipedia as her platform and an easy-to-access environment. What was the 33-year-old up to? Simple, utilizing free resources that anyone could access and, more importantly, anyone could see the results on the Internet, she personally wrote and posted the biographies of over one thousand women scientists active in research and science today.
Since she started, Wade has completed and posted over 1,600 entries on Wikipedia, a platform well-known for its tools that allow anyone to post information in an encyclopedia-style environment. Readers can then search the database and find information, knowledge, reference, and links provided by fellow users and curated on an ongoing basis by folks looking at the information and correcting it. Unfortunately, because Wikipedia is so open to anyone editing the information, it is not considered in academia or any other professional circles as a good reference source. However, the site does provide an easy-to-search system where folks can find information about people, places, things and events and find recognized links through those posts that are on accepted sites of research as well.
Jessica Wade was no stranger to Wikipedia before she started the women scientists project. In fact, she had been a regular and ardent user and poster on Wikipedia a decade earlier in her twenties. In that time window she realized much of the scientific recognition world was very one-sided. Scientists who were women or minorities were not getting their fair moment in the spotlight. So, regardless of what employers or the formal scientific halls promoted, Wade was going to make sure “other” scientists got more exposure online.
The project started with a few dozen posts. Then she got to one hundred, and eventually Wade’s work started to rack up over 500 different entries. The founder of Wikipedia recognized her work, and Wade started to add various awards to her own name for her tireless work documenting “other” scientists in a systematic manner. That said, not everyone was pleased. A number of fellow Wikipedia posters, as well as some likely from groups or organizations upset with Wade upsetting the apple cart, began to edit or delete her posts. Some were extremely influential in the Wikipedia world, giving weight to their edits over her original posts. The common argument was that Wade’s posts included scientists who were not known or famous and therefore should not have been posted as anything worthy of researching. That only fired up Wade even more in her project; it was that very reason for blocking people that caused them to not be recognized in the first place.
Clarice Phelps was a prime example, a woman and African-American scientist who was instrumental in identifying a new element on the periodic table. However, the Phelps post was put up and deleted repeatedly by naysayers. Eventually, Wade’s persistence won out, but she had to literally advocate for the value of Phelp’s work.
In Wade’s opinion, the issue isn’t that only a few women want to pursue science as a career. It’s that the exposure of possibilities for them isn’t wide enough. At least for her part, she’s contributing to reversing that trend. And, in recognition, even Buckingham Palace has recognized Wade for her work that continues today.
Rescuers Save 275 Parrots That Were Stranded By Hurricane Ian
LEE COUNTY, Fla. — When authorities asked residents to leave their homes due to the dangerous conditions of the roads – including a fallen bridge that blocked off access to food, fuel and other supplies – partners Will Peratino and Lauren Stepp refused to abandon their Pine Island complex.
The pair, who owns the Malama Manu Sanctuary on the island, would not go without their family of lemurs and birds – 275 parrots, which included some of the planet’s rarest.
Operation Noah’s Ark was created to capture, cage, and transport the birds away from the island on October 4th. The mission was executed in order to convince Peratino and Stepp to leave as well.
As volunteers collected the flock from numerous coops at the sanctuary, Stepp said she would never abandon them. “I can’t leave them behind,” Stepp remarked, saying if they cannot be given food or water, they will die.
Fruit, peanuts and other food provided by wildlife officials will soon be in low supply because of the fallen bridge and lack of gas throughout the island, all caused by Ian. The birds have been depending on these donations as their main source of sustenance.
The hurricane passed over Southwest Florida last weekend, bringing with it 150 mph winds and causing some roads to be inaccessible and islands out of reach. Dangerous flooding was caused by heavy rains and storm surges.
Prior to the storm, the owners of the animal sanctuary ushered their birds indoors to protect them from the severe weather outside.
“We almost drowned when four feet of water filled our house,” Peratino said before crying.
“To ensure that every bird is saved is a difficult task,” said Peratino. “It is almost hard to believe. The assistance we’ve received has been critical, and we are very grateful for it.”
A high number of the birds were collected from homes that couldn’t manage them any longer. Many are used for breeding purposes; however, the primary goal of the rescue missions is to save human life.
Project Dynamo’s founder, Bryan Stern, said his team has saved at least six dogs and three cats Tuesday in a massive rescue mission. Project Dynamo had gathered several boats for the operation.
“Will and Laura have dedicated their lives to the birds, and they’re going through their own hardships from the hurricane,” said Stern. “They don’t need to lose even more.”
The difficulty that the bird sanctuary encountered caught Ghassan Abboud’s interest, and he decided to help. Ghassan is a Chicago dentist who also owns a bird farm on Florida’s east coast. His idea was to get a little boat to take cages from Pine Island over to the mainland. From there, a trailer with air conditioning was used to transfer the birds all the way across Florida to his farm.
He ran into the Project Dynamo crew by chance as they were assisting in the rescue of individuals stranded by the storm’s floodwaters and battered roads.
“I could never come up with a script like this,” Abboud said. “It’s been incredible what these people have accomplished. They pulled together their resources and spared hundreds of birds.”
European Wildlife Starts to Return
Read any Western Civilization history book, and you’re bound to come across stories about the abundance of wildlife in Medieval Europe. In fact, the livestock was so plentiful and robust, many territories were cordoned off by kings and lords to protect inventory; disobedience via being caught hunting illegally was a death sentence. Wild boar, huge deer stags, bears and massive dire wolves were common in song and poems, as well as a massive diet of rabbits on everyone’s menu. However, today, one would be hard-pressed to find a bear, and the boars that show up in French woods seem to favor the puny side if they are seen at all. What happened?
Unfortunately, people and development have killed off a lot of the wildlife over the centuries. Europe even had its own form of bison before written records began to be produced, but they were pretty much extinct by the Roman age. Worldwide, the same story repeated itself, with the last big herds in the U.S. plains disappearing after the Indian Wars and the mid 1800s. However, despite hunting and fur-trades, the big decimator was man’s insatiable need to wipe out forests. That in Europe was the death-knell for numerous species that depended on the woods for cover, shelter and food.
The proof is in the records that exist. The mammals that were identified on the walls of prehistoric French caves were massive creatures. One unit easily fed an entire family clan and then some. However, by the time the serfs were coaxing cows across poorly tilled fields in Europe, cattle were far smaller. Domesticated, mild and constrained, the mammals of the Middle Ages were miniscule compared to their ancestors.
Conservation programs today are the source of modern-day miracles. From country to country, government-funded programs have been putting decades of field work and research into trying to bring back native species to their various territories, from blue-winged butterflies in England to otters, turtles and badgers in continental Europe. And, amazingly, the work is starting to pay off as well. Statistically, multiple mammal species in the wild are finally seeing their first substantial population increases in half a century.
Of course, these reintroductions take a careful balance. Multiple cases in science and biology can be referred to where the introduction of a “new” species caused more harm than good. Invasive species to what now exists can wreak serious havoc locally when they have no known predator or control.
So, what does all the growth mean for Europe today? While it won’t come close to the amazing stories recorded from history, the reintroduction may very well make the common impossible actually happen again. That is, being able to walk the countryside and actually see wildlife again doing what wildlife does on its own. When these sightings occur, it’s a significant win for the continent as well as all the hard work that made it happen.
OMG4 years ago
A Couple Gave Birth to the Most Beautiful Twins Ever
OMG5 years ago
20 Rare Historical Photos
OMG4 years ago
Hilarious Airport Photos
Cute4 years ago
Mom Refuses to Let Daughter Eat Sugar and Years Later This is What She Grows Into
OMG4 years ago
Top Secret Air Force One Facts That You Never Knew
OMG4 years ago
The Funniest Yearbook Photos Of All Time
OMG4 years ago
Retired Mathematician Restores Log Cabin
OMG3 years ago
What Happened When This ‘Duck Dynasty’ Legend Chopped Off His Beard?